Of course it’s not because the kids sit around watching TV and playing computer games, but I guess s/he is simply unaware that these diseases were on the decline in our country WAY before computers and televisions came into play. As a matter of fact, they were on the decline before vaccines were widely used.

What is responsible for the fact that we hardly ever see those diseases? Sanitation and access to good food and clean water. Not the injection of diseases or disease particles directly into the bodies of our most vulnerable members of society. Injections which, by the way, circumvent the majority our our immune systems and challenge the “last ditch” aspect of immunity. Unlike being actually exposed naturally to a disease.

And it doesn’t always work. Our bodies don’t always produce the desired antibodies. Sometimes they produce antibodies to other ingredients (ie: eggs) instead or as well as. Now, isn’t that useful. Now you have an allergy to eggs.

In my opinion, the choices are: 1. DEFINITELY expose your child to the dangers of vaccine reactions, and poisoning from the components of the vaccines (okay, so I don’t get reamed for it- they MAY have a reaction, but the poisonous components ARE there). or 2. Take the chance that your child MAY be exposed to a vaccine-preventable illness (most of which are mild with modern sanitation), and MAY develop the illness, and MAY have a bad case, and MAY have problems that can’t be solved via (homeopathic or otherwise) means.

If you can prove to me that’s the case, and prove to me that vaccines aren’t responsible in any way whatsoever, and actually prove to me that vaccines do work (I’m talking about randomized, double-blind, clinically controlled studies, not statistics of diseases declining over a certain period of time) then I’ll retract everything I said in this post.