<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New iCAT Scan Technology and its Potential for Upper Cervical Chiropractic</title>
	<atom:link href="http://theatlasoflife.com/2009/10/08/new-icat-scan-technology-and-its-potential-for-upper-cervical-chiropractic/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://theatlasoflife.com/2009/10/08/new-icat-scan-technology-and-its-potential-for-upper-cervical-chiropractic/</link>
	<description>Dr. Brandon Harshe &#124; Dallas/Fort Worth, TX Upper Cervical Chiropractor &#124; (214) 583-7307</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 00:02:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr. Ben Kuhn</title>
		<link>http://theatlasoflife.com/2009/10/08/new-icat-scan-technology-and-its-potential-for-upper-cervical-chiropractic/comment-page-1/#comment-1383</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Ben Kuhn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 02:15:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theatlasoflife.com/?p=2050#comment-1383</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve looked quite a bit at the iCAT technology, and the one concern I have right now is in accuracy.  I know that the images are very impressive, but what I don&#039;t know is how much of those images is computed interpolation of the points between the data points that are actually measured.

If anyone has that information or knows where to find it, I&#039;d be greatly interested ... without it though, there is too much accuracy required for at least the orthogonal upper cervical techniques to get too far into developing analysis for the 3-D images.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve looked quite a bit at the iCAT technology, and the one concern I have right now is in accuracy.  I know that the images are very impressive, but what I don&#8217;t know is how much of those images is computed interpolation of the points between the data points that are actually measured.</p>
<p>If anyone has that information or knows where to find it, I&#8217;d be greatly interested &#8230; without it though, there is too much accuracy required for at least the orthogonal upper cervical techniques to get too far into developing analysis for the 3-D images.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Travis Robertson</title>
		<link>http://theatlasoflife.com/2009/10/08/new-icat-scan-technology-and-its-potential-for-upper-cervical-chiropractic/comment-page-1/#comment-1377</link>
		<dc:creator>Travis Robertson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 17:09:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theatlasoflife.com/?p=2050#comment-1377</guid>
		<description>This is amazing technology and could improve the results we already get even more.  I also think it would provide a much higher level of agreement on where and how the upper cervical spine should be adjusted.  Thanks for sharing this with us Brandon, the pics are great.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is amazing technology and could improve the results we already get even more.  I also think it would provide a much higher level of agreement on where and how the upper cervical spine should be adjusted.  Thanks for sharing this with us Brandon, the pics are great.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

