(Editor’s note: This is a guest blog post by Dr. Adam Tanase. )
Not long ago, a patient arrived at my St. Louis chiropractic office for her appointment accompanied by her husband, an executive with Anheuser-Busch (AB-Inbev). He had some questions about Upper Cervical Care, the first being “How is this different from other styles of chiropractic adjusting?”
I immediately thought of his company’s TV commercials promoting Bud Light’s drinkability, so I used these advertisements as a springboard to answer his question.
A critical difference between Upper Cervical Care and various full-spine chiropractic approaches is holdability.
If it’s true that spinal misalignment impairs the body’s ability to function normally, then a successful outcome for any chiropractic adjustment would be a reduction or complete elimination of this problem. With that being said, the more often a person needs to be adjusted, the longer their body will remain in a state of perpetual malfunction.
I’m of the opinion that the most effective chiropractic techniques consistently achieve lengthy holding times. The longer a patient can maintain one spinal correction, the better off they are…
If a patient isn’t achieving measurable improvement and requires frequent and repetitive adjustments, there are five possible explanations why their correction isn’t holding:
- The analysis used to determine when and what to adjust is incorrect or incomplete
- The mechanism of the doctor’s adjustment (the how) is not being applied properly
- The patient is not doing their part by following their doctor’s home-care instructions
- The patient is exposed to chemical/emotional stress irrespective of structural balance
- Matter has exceeded limitations; permanent tissue damage prevents structural stabilization
Upper Cervical chiropractors are acutely aware of the role they play as facilitators of the healing process. If our calculations are wrong, or if our adjusting procedure is incorrect, we’re doing our patients a disservice. Making sure each patient receives a tailor-made adjustment based on their specific misalignment is something we take very seriously.
Among the myriad choices of chiropractic techniques available to doctors and patients today, I’ve found noteworthy consistency among those under the Upper Cervical umbrella. I believe the reason for this is because Upper Cervical Care isn’t merely a “technique” but rather a system of analysis.
The emphasis Upper Cervical doctors place on this system in order to achieve their unique holdability is ultimately what makes all the difference. I for one wouldn’t practice any other way.
Recommended Reading
* Subscribe to The Atlas of Life FREE Monthly Email Newsletter by clicking here!* Become a part of The Atlas of Life Chiropractic Directory today by clicking here!
{ 4 comments… read them below or add one }
I’ll drink that Kool-Aid! It took me a little while to learn how to “protect” my adjustment (stopped doing stupid) but now it’s so natural that I don’t think about it much. Almost 7mths – still holding!
Nice post!!
Very clear and well-written summary. I like it!
Analysis detail and accuracy are critical to an adjustment holding, so is a complete correction. Uncovering and identifying the primary subluxation from the compensations is also a consideration. I have seen an atlas listing change laterality, rotation and EnMAsse after reducing the the body’s compensation in the area.
Out of self preservation, the body will spread out a deeper, more damaging lesion by often times using a counter rotation pattern: Atlas, Occ rotation opposite and sometimes even including C2 in the counter rotation.
Appreciate your post. If we are doing our job, fewer adjusting visits is the goal and result!…
Nano Greens is my everyday drink!